Opinion / Andrew Tuck
Higher ground
Before I did the interview, I thought that I might write about the ongoing saga of a piece of public-art-meets-architecture that so far has failed to hit its mark. But after the interview, well, perhaps this is about something more interesting: how to deal with criticism.
For the past few weeks, the Marble Arch Mound, a £2m (€2.4) pop-up construction at the western end of retail strip Oxford Street in London, has been the subject of much ire, variously slammed for being ugly, a waste of money and for bearing little resemblance to the shrubby renders that did the rounds before it opened (including by me).
For Monocle 24’s The Urbanist this week, we thought it was about time to call its designer, Gijs Rikken of Dutch architecture practice MVRDV, to hear his view on the brouhaha. For someone whose project has been heaped with such opprobrium, he was sanguine. He was even keen to get more feedback from my visit with The Urbanist team to the site – because of coronavirus travel rules, he has never been to see the Mound. What I wanted to know, though, was how he had handled being slammed like this?
“In a way, it always affects you, right?” says Rikken. “It’s this way with all the projects that you are heavily involved with; they become a part of you. It is also something that inspires you to listen and see those comments, and to see where things could have been better.” And, yes, he remains convinced that nature will still help to cover up the bald patches on the Mound and help him to deliver a successful project before it is taken down in January. I am not so sure and explained my concerns. Again, he simply took them on board with a calm consideration.
Rikken is not pretending that all is perfect. He knows that this has not been the immediate triumph that he would have hoped for, even if he declined my suggestion that it was a failure. But he comes across as a man who absorbs the hits and manages to move on. “It’s about learning how to deal with these things and taking that on to the next experience,” he says.
And he’s right. Somehow, we have to accept criticism when we fail to deliver and sift the critiques for what’s justified and what’s not. So perhaps the Mound should be marketed not for its view or the promise of a remake of flourishing nature but rather as a place to climb and contemplate how we could do things better next time. And not give in. See, perhaps it does have a purpose after all.
Listen to the interview with Gijs Rikken on tonight’s episode of ‘The Urbanist’.