Opinion / Alexei Korolyov
Haunted house
Can a building be evil? Should we erase the dark parts of history or keep them as a reminder of humanity’s past failures? These are questions that many Austrians are grappling with due to one of the nation’s most controversial structures: a terraced house (pictured) in Braunau am Inn, near Austria’s border with Germany, which was briefly the home of the newborn Adolf Hitler. In some sense the “Hitlerhaus” is a bit of a misnomer: the building never belonged to the Hitlers and the future dictator only lived there for a few short weeks after his birth in 1889. In the public imagination, however, there’s no escaping its grim symbolism.
It’s easy to argue that it might have been better for all concerned if it had been destroyed in the war (many Nazi-linked sites were), not least because it’s become an unpleasant site of pilgrimage for neo-Nazis. However, some maintain that its survival is a useful – albeit painful – reminder of the horrors of what came to pass, and of Austria’s own complicity in them. The reminder is a timely one. Earlier this month the far-right Freedom Party, founded after the Second World War by former Nazis, entered the regional government of the country’s second most populous state, Lower Austria.
Before the Austrian Interior Ministry acquired the building in 2016, it had been many things: a school, a bank branch and a centre for disabled people. In 2020 the ministry announced that it wanted to “neutralise” the site and turn it into a police station – a proposal that lacks logic and taste given the Austrian police’s track record of racism and xenophobia. Whatever the plan, the Interior Ministry must decide how to turn this disheartening monument into a place of memory and reconciliation. Leaving it unmarked and its future in the air creates an unsettling sense of ambiguity.
Alexei Korolyov is Monocle’s Vienna correspondent. You can hear a report on this subject on ‘The Urbanist’.